<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparison Difference between Canon Powershot S90 VS Nikon Coolpix P90</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doanalyze.com/comparison-difference-between-canon-powershot-s90-vs-nikon-coolpix-p90/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doanalyze.com/comparison-difference-between-canon-powershot-s90-vs-nikon-coolpix-p90/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=comparison-difference-between-canon-powershot-s90-vs-nikon-coolpix-p90</link>
	<description>Analyze before you buy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:21:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: APhotographer</title>
		<link>http://www.doanalyze.com/comparison-difference-between-canon-powershot-s90-vs-nikon-coolpix-p90/comment-page-1/#comment-3676</link>
		<dc:creator>APhotographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doanalyze.com/?p=1171#comment-3676</guid>
		<description>This is the most idiotic review and comparison i have ever seen. Here site is trying to compare a car with a truck. A car is small in size more beautiful, filled with more luxury features and is for carrying people. Truck is a lot bigger with less luxury and it is used to carry goods. Wake up &#039;Doanalyze.com&#039;.
Are you out of mind, you are comparing S90 with nikon p90 and also trying to prove that nikon p90 is better. LOL
S90 is a very small pocket size camera which has got a lot bigger senser size ( 1/1.7&quot;) than p90, it has got a lot faster lense (aperture 2.0). It has full manual controls with support to RAW format. Nothing can come close to canon s90 in low light performance (except canon G11) in non- DSLR segment.
This review is just waste of time, check dpreview.com or some other good site for better idea about the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most idiotic review and comparison i have ever seen. Here site is trying to compare a car with a truck. A car is small in size more beautiful, filled with more luxury features and is for carrying people. Truck is a lot bigger with less luxury and it is used to carry goods. Wake up &#8216;Doanalyze.com&#8217;.<br />
Are you out of mind, you are comparing S90 with nikon p90 and also trying to prove that nikon p90 is better. LOL<br />
S90 is a very small pocket size camera which has got a lot bigger senser size ( 1/1.7&#8243;) than p90, it has got a lot faster lense (aperture 2.0). It has full manual controls with support to RAW format. Nothing can come close to canon s90 in low light performance (except canon G11) in non- DSLR segment.<br />
This review is just waste of time, check dpreview.com or some other good site for better idea about the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

